The brutal reality of the impact of fiscal austerity
measures means that thousands of households will slide into long term financial
distress, joining over 100,000 others who have no hope of ever repaying what
they owe in full.
The consumer debt crisis is a unique event requiring a
unique response that can only be provided by the Government. With over 150,000 people
needing help, resolving billions in unaffordable debt will require hundreds of
thousands of debt settlement agreements with multiple creditors such as banks, credit unions, revenue, local
authorities and utility companies.
No one existing service provider has the
resources or operational competencies to do this and leaving it to the private
sector is not a realistic option.
With no consumer protection regulations governing the
provision of debt advice, resolution negotiation and settlement, current service offerings fragment across a state
funded agent, not- for- profit services and a host of differing commercial
operations.
MABS, through its national network of independent
self-governing autonomous offices, is doing its best to respond. The demand for
advice has spawned a plethora of commercial debt advisers. Some are charging
fees of people in debt. Others are using free advice as a lead generation tool
to sell life insurance and credit products.
Many are using exploitative tactics, baiting people with
emotional marketing and misleading promises. Some are deliberately
playing on people’s fears by falsely claiming they will instantly relieve psychological
stress. Fabricating client testimonials to sell their services, they use
suicide and clinical depression statistics to market free financial advice.
Debt advice, resolution and settlement services are
regarded as high risk consumer protection activities as there is a heightened
risk of exploitative business practices, including the provision of bad advice
and predatory selling of unsuitable products and services.
Yet, exploitative marketing claims and misleading statements are being made by regulated financial intermediaries who are subject to consumer
protection codes of conduct when selling financial service products. The very
people who became quite skilled at getting people into unaffordable debt are
now claiming they are skilled at getting them out of it.
The provision of debt advice/resolution services is an
expensive, inherently unprofitable business unless it’s paid for by creditors.
No operator has the financial resources or capacity to deliver on the scale
and scope of services required to deliver a comprehensive service.
Even if a private
commercial operation could charge enough, it would need well over 50,000
customers to break-even. The likelihood of any private company having the
resources to invest in achieving this scale is non-existent. Furthermore
private operations cannot provide the scope of professional debt resolution services
required.
It is also the case that the sheer scale of the need for
advice and resolution is the result of a one off, non-recurring event. Any
service response will have to have the capacity to deal with large numbers of
customers and their multiple creditors using standardised, efficient and
effective processes. Achieving this will need improved codes of conduct and
protocols governing debt enforcement and resolution.
The principal of the “All Debt” approach has been widely
accepted as the appropriate service model. All debt includes mediating
resolution agreements with the full range of principal creditors-credit
institutions, revenue, local authorities and utilities. The service should provide
advice, financial affordability assessment, recommend solutions, draft multi-creditor
settlement proposals, make representations and negotiate realistic settlements
with creditors.
The only realistic solution is for the Government to
establish an independent, all debt advisory and resolution service.
Designed to
fit with whatever non-judicial mechanism and process is finally legislated for
it should be governed and operated on a not-for-profit, commercial basis and should include for two components - secured home mortgage debt and
other debt. How the unaffordable element
of mortgage debt is resolved is not really an issue. The key is that all debts
are dealt with, through an integrated approach.
Working with other stakeholders, the debt resolution service
should be empowered to improve the existing consumer protection framework, ensuring that people are afforded the professional representation they need,
protection from abusive enforcement tactics and standardisation of creditor
collection and settlement approaches.
The current situation with hundreds of debt
advisors, offering varying degrees of service, in an unregulated market, is a
recipe for consumer exploitation.
As the scale of the crisis and scope of
services required by people means that only one agent has the power and
resources to respond to their needs, will Government act to create a national
debt advice and resolution service and allocate the funding needed in the
budget ?
A version of this article appeared in the Irish Examiner, Business Section, Monday 5th December 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment